The Algorithmic Unconscious
How AI is Rewriting the Grammar of Art and Origin
Sarah Andersen, creator of the beloved webcomic "Sarah's Scribbles," never gave permission for her work to train an AI. Yet users can now prompt Midjourney to create images "in the style of Sarah Andersen," and the algorithm will generate convincing approximations of her whimsical character designs and distinctive drawing techniques.
This isn't piracy in any traditional sense. Something more unsettling has occurred: artistic DNA has been extracted, processed, and made endlessly reproducible. Following the September 2025 settlement that saw Anthropic pay $1.5 billion to authors, visual artists face a more diffuse form of appropriation that challenges fundamental assumptions about creativity and authenticity.
What we're witnessing in courtrooms across the country isn't simply a dispute over copyright infringement. It's a fundamental renegotiation of the relationship between human and machine creativity—one that will determine whether art remains a fundamentally human endeavor or becomes another domain optimized by algorithmic intelligence.
Read the full analysis